The government doesn’t really prosecute for polygamy anymore, but a lot of the arrests are of groups supporting themselves through welfare scams or for child abuse. So that was all I’d really heard about polygamists.
— Hollywood actress Jeanne Tripplehorn
A RECENT verdict issued by the Supreme Court (SC) stated that “a party to a civil marriage who converts to Islam and contracts another marriage, despite the first marriage’s subsistence, is guilty of bigamy.” Likewise, the verdict read, guilty is the spouse in the subsequent marriage.
Therefore, a person who converts to Islam and then contracts a second marriage while the previous one remains legally in effect will be accused of bigamy and this has been proven in a decision penned by Supreme Court associate justice Marvic Leonen who spelled out in clear terms that conversion to Islam . . . does not exempt one from criminal liability. The high court had affirmed a Court of Appeals (CA) ruling in 2015 where a couple married under Muslim law had been found guilty of bigamy. This crime carries a penalty of imprisonment of up to 12 years.
The couple in question—who turned to the Supreme Court to assail the CA decision—admitted they got married in 2005 even when the man’s marriage to his first wife had yet to be legally dissolved. The petitioners claimed they could not be penalized for bigamy as they converted to Islam prior to their marriage. They argued that the Muslim Code—and not the general law of the land, or the Civil Code—applies in their case.
But the Supreme Court pointed out that while Islamic law allows polygyny, it only does so in ‘exceptional cases, in particular, if the Muslim (spouse) “can deal with (their wives) with equal companionship and just treatment. It added that the Muslim Code is not applicable in the aforementioned case since the first wife is a non-Muslim. Article 13(2) of the Muslim Code explicitly spells out that the Civil Code governs marriages where either party is non-Muslim and which were not solemnized in Muslim rites. There is no conflict with general law here.
With this in view, we realize that the question of polygamy is an interesting one in that most people today view polygamy as immoral while the Bible nowhere explicitly condemns it.
The first instance polygamy or bigamy was mentioned in the Holy Book was that of Lamech in Genesis 4:19: “Lamech married two women.” The truth is that several prominent men in the Old Testament were polygamists—Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon, and others all had multiple wives. In fact, Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines (essentially wives of a lower status), according to 1 Kings 11:3.
So what are we to do with these instances of polygamy in the Old Testament? There are three questions that need to be answered: 1) Why did God allow polygamy in the Old Testament? 2) How does God view polygamy today?, and 3) Why did it change?
Why did God allow polygamy in the Old Testament? The Bible does not specifically say why God allowed polygamy. As we speculate about God’s silence, there is at least one key factor to consider. Due to patriarchal societies, it was nearly impossible for an unmarried woman to provide for herself. Women were often uneducated and untrained. Women relied on their fathers, brothers, and husbands for provision and protection. Unmarried women were often subjected to prostitution and slavery.
So, it seems that God may have allowed polygamy to protect and provide for the women who could not find a husband otherwise. A man would take multiple wives and serve as the provider and protector of all of them. While definitely not ideal, living in a polygamist household was far better than the alternatives: prostitution, slavery, or starvation. In addition to the protection or provision factor, polygamy enabled a much faster expansion of humanity, fulfilling God’s command to “be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth” (Genesis 9:7). Men are capable of impregnating multiple women in the same time period, causing humanity to grow much faster than if each man was only producing one child each year.
In the second question of how does God views polygamy today, it is said that even while allowing polygamy, the Bible presents monogamy as the plan that conforms most closely to God’s ideal for marriage. The Bible says that God’s original intention was for one man to be married to only one woman: “For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife (not wives), and they will become one flesh (not fleshes)” (Genesis 2:24). While Genesis 2:24 is describing what marriage is, rather than how many people are involved, the consistent use of the singular should be noted. In Deuteronomy 17:14-20, God says that the kings were not supposed to multiply wives (or horses or gold). While this cannot be interpreted as a command that the kings must be monogamous, it can be understood as declaring that having multiple wives causes problems. This can be clearly seen in the life of Solomon (1 King 11:3-4).
In the New Testament, 1 Timothy 3:2, 12 and Titus 1:6 give “the husband of one wife” in a list of qualifications for spiritual leadership. There is some debate as to what specifically this qualification means. The phrase could literally be translated as “a one-woman man.” Whether or not this phrase is referring exclusively to polygamy, in no sense can a polygamist be considered a “one-woman man.” While these qualifications are specifically for positions of spiritual leadership, they should apply equally to all Christians. Should not all Christians be “above reproach . . . temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money” (1 Timothy 3:2-4)? If we are called to be holy (1 Peter 1:16), and if these standards are holy for elders and deacons, then they are holy for all.
Ephesians 5:22-33 speaks of the relationship between husbands and wives. When referring to a husband (singular), it always also refers to a wife (singular). “For the husband is the head of the wife (singular) . . . He who loves his wife (singular) loves himself. For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife (singular), and the two will become one flesh . . . Each one of you also must love his wife (singular) as he loves himself, and the wife (singular) must respect her husband (singular).” While a somewhat parallel passage, Colossians 3:18-19, refers to husbands and wives in the plural, it is clear that Paul is addressing all the husbands and wives among the Colossian believers, not stating that a husband might have multiple wives. In contrast, Ephesians 5:22-33 is specifically describing the marital relationship. If polygamy were allowable, the entire illustration of Christ’s relationship with His body (the church) and the husband-wife relationship falls apart.
So finally we ask, why did things change in dealing with polygamy? It is not so much God’s disallowing something He previously allowed as it is God’s restoring marriage to His original plan. Even going back to Adam and Eve, polygamy was not God’s original intent. God seems to have allowed polygamy to solve a problem, but it is not ideal. In most modern societies, there is absolutely no need for polygamy. In most cultures today, women are able to provide for and protect themselves—removing the only “positive” aspect of polygamy. Further, most modern nations outlaw polygamy. According to Romans 13:1-7, we are to obey the laws the government establishes. The only instance in which disobeying the law is permitted by Scripture is if the law contradicts God’s commands (Acts 5:29). Since God only allows for polygamy and does not command it, a law prohibiting polygamy should be upheld.
Are there some instances in which the allowance for polygamy would still apply today? Perhaps, but it is unfathomable that there would be no other possible solution. Due to the “one flesh” aspect of marriage, the need for oneness and harmony in marriage, and the lack of any real need for polygamy, it is our firm belief that polygamy does not honor God and is not His design for marriage.
FOR your comments or suggestions, complaints or requests, just send a message through my email email@example.com or text me at cellphone numbers 09054292382 for Globe subscribers and 09391252568 for Smart. Thank you and Mabuhay!